Page 2 of 2

Germany and the "Values-Based" Trap

Germany joined the fray more recently, with Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock championing a "values-based" foreign policy that is explicitly feminist. Germany, however, is a nation that cannot afford to play games with reality. As the industrial heart of Europe, Germany’s stability depends on cheap energy and secure trade routes.

By adopting a policy that prioritizes ideological alignment over pragmatic national interest, Germany has found itself in an energy stranglehold. The push for "feminist" and "green" transitions—which often go hand-in-hand in these policy circles—has led to the deindustrialization of the country.

The economic harm is tangible. German manufacturers are moving overseas, and the average German man is seeing his purchasing power evaporate. When the economy falters, social friction increases. Germany has also seen a rise in violent crime and a breakdown in social cohesion in major cities, largely attributed to a refusal to implement strict border controls—a refusal rooted in the fear of appearing "un-feminist" or "intolerant."

Germany: The Deindustrialization of an Engine

Germany has long been the industrial heart of Europe, built on the strength of its engineering, its manufacturing, and a stable, middle-class workforce. However, the pursuit of an ideological, "values-based" policy—which includes the aggressive "feminization" of its foreign stance alongside radical energy transitions—has left the German engine sputtering.

The Energy Stranglehold The decision to shut down Germany’s remaining nuclear power plants in 2023, while simultaneously severing ties with its primary energy supplier, was a move of profound geopolitical risk. For the German man working in the automotive or machinery sectors, this has translated into energy costs nearly three times higher than those in the United States.

Economic Indicators of Decline (2024-2025):

• Industrial Output: Plunged by 4.3% in late 2025 alone, with the automotive sector—the crown jewel of German industry—contracting by a staggering 18.5%.

• Stagnant Growth: GDP growth for 2025 is projected at a mere 0.2%, following years of stagnation where economic output remains roughly at 2019 levels.

• Insolvencies: Corporate bankruptcies rose by over 13% in the first quarter of 2025 compared to the previous year, as manufacturers can no longer compete on the global stage.

This is not just a "market correction." It is a structural decline. When a government prioritizes global social projects over the energy security required to power its factories, it abdicates its responsibility to the men whose livelihoods depend on those factories.

The Internal Cost: The Erosion of the Social Contract

What the architects of Feminist Foreign Policy fail to realize is that the social contract is a two-way street. Men agree to contribute to the state, to serve in its military, and to abide by its laws in exchange for one primary thing: Protection. Protection of their families, protection of their property, and protection of their way of life.

When a government pivots to a Feminist Foreign Policy, it is essentially telling its male citizens that their traditional role as protectors is obsolete, and that the state’s primary concern is now the "global sisterhood." This creates a vacuum of leadership. When the state stops acting as a protector, men stop trusting the state.

This lack of trust manifests in several ways:

1. Mass Immigration and Social Friction: By prioritizing "openness" over security, FFP countries have seen a rise in "parallel societies." These are areas where the laws of the host country are ignored, and where women and children are often at the highest risk of assault.

2. Economic Stagnation: Redirecting resources to ideological projects abroad while the domestic infrastructure decays leads to a disenfranchised workforce.

3. The Crisis of Masculinity: When the state devalues traditional masculine virtues—strength, decisiveness, and protection—in favor of "soft" values, it leaves young men without a blueprint. They see their leaders apologizing for their nation’s history while failing to secure its future.

The Statistics of Reality

Let’s look at the numbers, because numbers don't have an ideological bias. In many of the countries that have most aggressively pursued these policies, we see a correlation with troubling trends.

These aren't just "growing pains." They are the results of a fundamental misunderstanding of human nature. You cannot run a country on empathy alone. You run a country on law, order, and the ability to defend your borders.

The Way Forward: A Return to Realism

The "downfall" described here isn't necessarily a total collapse—not yet. But it is a steady erosion. It is the sound of a foundation cracking.

For the men who care about the future of the West, the solution isn't to retreat into bitterness. It is to demand a return to Foreign Policy Realism. This doesn't mean we stop caring about human rights; it means we realize that you cannot project "rights" into the world if your own house is on fire.

A nation’s first duty is to its own. This means:

• Border Integrity: Recognizing that a country without a border isn't a country; it's a parking lot.

• Economic Sovereignty: Prioritizing the energy and industrial needs of the citizenry over globalist "climate equity" goals.

• A Culture of Protection: Re-centering the idea that men have a vital, necessary role in the security of their communities.

The experiment of Feminist Foreign Policy has provided enough data. We have seen the rise in crime, the economic strain, and the loss of national prestige. It turns out that the world is still a place of wolves, and a nation that tries to talk to the wolves in the language of "gendered perspectives" usually ends up as dinner.

It’s time for a more grounded approach. One that recognizes that the best way to help the world is to be a strong, stable, and secure nation first. We need leaders who aren't afraid to be men, and a policy that isn't afraid to put its own people—men, women, and children—at the very top of the priority list.

The era of the "sentinel" needs to return. Because when the hard reality of the world comes knocking, "soft power" won't be enough to hold the door.